Horoscope change?

[iHaunt]

Ok, anyone ever heard about the horoscope change? I read it from Haunt World site.... my birthday is on September 14th, and it is Virgo.... but it will change to Leo.

[Pumpkin_Man]

How can it be changed. If Virgo was in the sky on the date and year you were born, you have to be a Virgo. I don't know where you got that information, but the stars in the sky are pretty consistant about being where they are at the times that they are supposed to be there. Leo is visable in July, Cancer in August, and so on and so on.

As for Astrology in generel, however, I don't put too much stock init. I'm more into Astronomy then Astrology.

Mike

[iHaunt]

Ok, I found it from http://www.hauntworld.com/haunted_house ... hp?t=14043

[Ciuin]

I've always felt, deep down, that I was a Pisces and not an Aries.

[Miss Monster]

I've always felt, deep down, that I was a Pisces and not an Aries.

oh right, our birthdays are close aren't they? thats what mine would be as well, but I know I'm not a fish

[Ciuin]

I'm torn between the two. I'm a selkie. If anyone asks what my sign is, I think I'll tell them that.

[Miss Monster]

lol we should all assume new astrological signs. I think I'd be a succubus

[Andybev01]

I'm an egregious.

[Spookymufu]

I'm a Taurus, born and die. I will not change, it fits me perfectly!

http://www.astrology.com/taurus-sun-sig ... -d-d-66950

^^ that is sooooo me!

[Andybev01]

well, I've always thought that you were full of bull.

[iHaunt]

So, should I still be a Virgo? Or, what?? Should I change it? Then why was that old granny posted saying something about horoscope changing things?!?!

[witchy]

That makes me a, Ophiuchus: Nov. 29- Dec. 17. I don't even know what that is!!

[Ciuin]

It means you love snakes, I guess.

[Spookymufu]

well, I've always thought that you were full of bull.

if you read that whole thing, it also means I'm an @ss hole

[Pumpkin_Man]

Olay, folks, I looded at the article iHaunt posted and it clearly states that ASTRONOMERS, not ASTROLOGERS have added that sign. There is a vast world of differene between the exact science fo ASTRONOMY, and the more faith based study of ASTROLOGY. ASTROLOGY is the philosophy that determines what your luck is going to be, and whether or not you are a "leo," or a "Pices," etc. ASTRONOMY is the study of how these bodies movie, whether or not there are planets revolving around them. ASTRONOMERS also study things like the density of the various stars in a constilation, whether theya re blue giants, red giants, nuetron stars, or white dwarfs, or yellow suns.

We're talking exact science vs a faith based belief system. If you believe in the signs of the zidiac and want to determine how your life is going to turnout based on these ASTROLOGICAL signs, you become an ASTROLOGIST. If you want to work for NASA, or study the stars, or serch for life on another planet, you become an ASTRONOMER.

That biing said, the article pointed out that the new "sign of the zosiac" was added by ASTRONOMERS. ASTRONOMERS, not ASTROLOGERS.

What do the ASTROLOGERS have to say about the new sign of the zodiac? ASTRONOMY and ASTROLOGY are at odds with each other. ASTRONOMERS see themselvs as "serious scientists," and think ASTROLOGY is nothing more then a superstition. ASTROLOGERS see their study as an important guid on how to live and plan out your day, and they think that ASTRONOMERS are too concerned with the exact make-up of the stars and more or less miss the point. So while ASTRONOMERS are pointing out a new 'sign of the zidiac," ASTROLOGERS may not have gone along with it.

Mike